chips

search for more blogs here

 

"The Chips Fall to Abu Dhabi" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-11-13 12:00:27

A global semiconductor company with manufacturing research and development and sales and administrative facilities throughout … The Company makes markets and sells integrated digital technology products integrated circuits for computing and communications industries. Dr. Ruiz. 61 is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Micro Devices. Inc. Dr. Ruiz joined Advanced Micro Devices. … The embattled chipmaker now has some Middle Eastern money to help it in its fight against rival. The Mubadala Development Company which is the investment vehicle of the government of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates has invested $622 million for an 8.1 percent stake in the chipmaker A. M. D. The news was first by the "This investment strengthens A. M. D.'s ability to deliver customer-centric innovation and choice to the marketplace creating greater value for all of our shareholders," said A. M. D chief executive in. Mubadala paid $12.70 per share for its stake which was A. M. D.'s closing price yesterday. Its share price was unchanged in morning trading. The Abu Dhabi investment firm will not receive a board seat and its investment is considered noncontrolling. A. M. D. which is a distant second behind semiconductor giant Intel has waged a David versus Goliath battle in recent years. A. M. D gained ground when it beat Intel to market with improved technology several years ago but it fell behind in recent quarters after Intel slashed its prices. In the third quarter. A. M. D lost $396 million and it is expected to remain in the red for the coming quarters. Selecting "Remember me" allows you to make comments on the site for 30 days without having to enter your name and email address each time. Your information will be saved only for this period and will not be shared. I agree that submitting a comment constitutes acceptance of the and. We encourage comments that foster a respectful constructive dialogue. If you've read a comment that you believe violates site etiquette please report it to us using the form below. We will review the comment in question and then decide whether it should be removed. Inappropriate comments include those that contain or solicit personal information use obscene or offensive language or make unauthorized or commercial offers. Thank you for your interest in keeping Portfolio com a place where ideas and conversations can thrive. Fields marked with an asterisk * are required. Quotes delayed 15 minutes for NASDAQ. 20 minutes for NYSE and AMEX. Market Data provided by Interactive Data. Powered and implemented by. Company fundamental data provided by Hemscott. Economic data provided by Econoday. News provided by Comtex. Sec Filings data provided by Edgars. The Wall Street Horizon National Consumer Interest Rate Survey. PMMS Mortgage Data ©2008. Mortgage averages are for conforming mortgages with 20% down.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://feeds.portfolio.com/~r/portfolio/allportfolio/~3/185834686/Abu-Dhabi-Doubles-Down-Buys-Chips

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Intel rolls out 45nm ?Penryn? gaming, server chips" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-15 14:52:49

Intel yesterday rolled out its first 45nm ‘Penryn’ processors including a new top-of-the-line gaming chip the Core 2 Extreme QX9650. The other 45nm neophytes were Xeon-brand server chips though Intel also used the opportunity to roll out a set of 65nm Xeons too. The 45nm. LGA771 Xeons split into two groups: the 65/80W E5xxx series and the 80/120/150W X5xxx family. The former run from the 1.86GHz E5205 with 6MB of L2 lay aside and a 1066MHz frontside bus (FSB) speed to the 3GHz E5472 which sports a 1600MHz FSB and contains 12MB of cache. The E505 consumes 65W - all the rest of the E5xxx lie consume 80W. In between are a series of CPUs with 1333MHz FSBs. The X series comprises the 80W X5260 and X5272 clocked at 3.33GHz and 3.4GHz respectively. Both have 6MB of L2 but FSBs of 1333MHz and 1600MHz respectively. The X5450 and X5460 consume 120W as does the X5472. The first two run 1333MHz FSBs while the X5472 sits on a 1600MHz FSB as does the top-of-the-line. 150W X5482. The four CPUs all include 12MB of L2 and are clocked respectively at 3GHz. 3.16GHz. 3GHz and 3.2GHz. The new 65nm. LGA775 Xeons are models designed for uni-processor servers and workstations. The line-up comprises the 2.33GHz 3065 the 2.66GHz 3075 and the 3GHz 3085. All three support the 1333MHz FSB speed - up from previous 3xxx-series chips’ 1066MHz - and all have 4MB of L2. Intel’s current determine list which includes all these CPUs can be found. The QX9650 contains 12MB of L2 is clocked at 3GHz and sits on a 1333MHz FSB. Like all previous Core 2 Extreme CPUs it costs $999 when sold in batches of 1000 processors. You can construe Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href strong em code). All lie breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published. act it PG-13 people! XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym call=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <touch> <strong> Gravatar Icon: Notice the conceive of when other people post their comment? To undergo your conceive of viewed on any single blog on kolej10 com register is easy on. is the property of. Any views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) only. All trademarks slogans logos represented used or referred to in this site are the property of their respective owners.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://sawak.kolej10.com/2007/11/17/intel-rolls-out-45nm-penryn-gaming-server-chips/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Intel rolls out 45nm ?Penryn? gaming, server chips" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-15 14:52:11

Intel yesterday rolled out its first 45nm ‘Penryn’ processors including a new top-of-the-line gaming chip the core out 2 Extreme QX9650. The other 45nm neophytes were Xeon-brand server chips though Intel also used the opportunity to turn out a set of 65nm Xeons too. The 45nm. LGA771 Xeons split into two groups: the 65/80W E5xxx series and the 80/120/150W X5xxx family. The former run from the 1.86GHz E5205 with 6MB of L2 cache and a 1066MHz frontside bus (FSB) go to the 3GHz E5472 which sports a 1600MHz FSB and contains 12MB of cache. The E505 consumes 65W - all the be of the E5xxx line consume 80W. In between are a series of CPUs with 1333MHz FSBs. The X series comprises the 80W X5260 and X5272 clocked at 3.33GHz and 3.4GHz respectively. Both have 6MB of L2 but FSBs of 1333MHz and 1600MHz respectively. The X5450 and X5460 consume 120W as does the X5472. The first two run 1333MHz FSBs while the X5472 sits on a 1600MHz FSB as does the top-of-the-line. 150W X5482. The four CPUs all contain 12MB of L2 and are clocked respectively at 3GHz. 3.16GHz. 3GHz and 3.2GHz. The new 65nm. LGA775 Xeons are models designed for uni-processor servers and workstations. The line-up comprises the 2.33GHz 3065 the 2.66GHz 3075 and the 3GHz 3085. All three support the 1333MHz FSB speed - up from previous 3xxx-series chips’ 1066MHz - and all have 4MB of L2. Intel’s current determine enumerate which includes all these CPUs can be found. The QX9650 contains 12MB of L2 is clocked at 3GHz and sits on a 1333MHz FSB. Like all previous Core 2 Extreme CPUs it costs $999 when sold in batches of 1000 processors. You can read mention Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href strong em code). All lie breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments ordain be edited or deleted. telecommunicate addresses will never be published. act it PG-13 populate! XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <label> <em> <i> <touch> <strong> Gravatar Icon: Notice the conceive of when other populate post their mention? To undergo your picture viewed on any single communicate on kolej10 com register is easy on. is the property of. Any views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) only. All trademarks slogans logos represented used or referred to in this place are the property of their respective owners.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://sawak.kolej10.com/2007/11/17/intel-rolls-out-45nm-penryn-gaming-server-chips/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Intel rolls out 45nm ?Penryn? gaming, server chips" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-15 14:52:09

Intel yesterday rolled out its first 45nm ‘Penryn’ processors including a new top-of-the-line gaming divide the core out 2 Extreme QX9650. The other 45nm neophytes were Xeon-brand server chips though Intel also used the opportunity to roll out a set of 65nm Xeons too. The 45nm. LGA771 Xeons split into two groups: the 65/80W E5xxx series and the 80/120/150W X5xxx family. The former run from the 1.86GHz E5205 with 6MB of L2 cache and a 1066MHz frontside bus (FSB) speed to the 3GHz E5472 which sports a 1600MHz FSB and contains 12MB of cache. The E505 consumes 65W - all the rest of the E5xxx line consume 80W. In between are a series of CPUs with 1333MHz FSBs. The X series comprises the 80W X5260 and X5272 clocked at 3.33GHz and 3.4GHz respectively. Both have 6MB of L2 but FSBs of 1333MHz and 1600MHz respectively. The X5450 and X5460 consume 120W as does the X5472. The first two run 1333MHz FSBs while the X5472 sits on a 1600MHz FSB as does the top-of-the-line. 150W X5482. The four CPUs all contain 12MB of L2 and are clocked respectively at 3GHz. 3.16GHz. 3GHz and 3.2GHz. The new 65nm. LGA775 Xeons are models designed for uni-processor servers and workstations. The line-up comprises the 2.33GHz 3065 the 2.66GHz 3075 and the 3GHz 3085. All three give the 1333MHz FSB speed - up from previous 3xxx-series chips’ 1066MHz - and all have 4MB of L2. Intel’s current determine list which includes all these CPUs can be found. The QX9650 contains 12MB of L2 is clocked at 3GHz and sits on a 1333MHz FSB. Like all previous core out 2 Extreme CPUs it costs $999 when sold in batches of 1000 processors. You can construe Comment Guidelines: Basic XHTML is allowed (a href strong em code). All lie breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published. act it PG-13 people! XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> Gravatar Icon: Notice the conceive of when other people post their mention? To undergo your conceive of viewed on any hit blog on kolej10 com enter is easy on. is the property of. Any views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) only. All trademarks slogans logos represented used or referred to in this site are the property of their respective owners.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://sawak.kolej10.com/2007/11/17/intel-rolls-out-45nm-penryn-gaming-server-chips/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Comment on Google?s Secret 10GbE Switch by Andrew@Nyquist muses on ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 13:22:23

It is our opinion that explore () has designed and deployed home-grown 10GbE switches as part of a secret internal initiative that was launched when it realized commercial options couldn’t meet the cost and cater consumption targets required for their data centers. This decision by Google while small in terms of units purchased is enormous in terms of the disruptive force it should have on 10GbE switching equipment providers and their component supply chains. It is as if a just arrived in the Enterprise networking business and the orbits of the existing satellites undergo begun to shift without observers knowing why - until now. We were watching shipments of SFP+ components for 10GbE in the market but simply couldn’t be for their end destination - sort of an optical component dark matter problem. After a great deal of investigation we have reached the following opinion: Through conversations with multiple carrier equipment and component industry sources we have confirmed that Google has designed built and deployed homebrewed 10GbE switches for providing server connect within their data centers. This is very similar to explore’s efforts to create its own server computers (excellent article ). Google realized that because its computing needs were very specific it could create by mental act and build computers that were cheaper and lower power than off the shelf alternatives. The decision to do so had a profound impact on server architecture and influenced the market’s act to displace power density solutions that Sun () . Intel () and AMD () now embrace. It now appears that the affect explore trail blazed in the server computing market will repeat itself in the enterprise switching market. Given the relative dearth of low-cost 10GbE switching solutions it isn’t surprising to see Google return this come. We believe Google based their current change by reversal design on Broadcom’s () 20-port 10GE switch silicon () and SFP+ based connect. It is likely that Broadcom’s 10GbE PHY is also being employed. This would be a repeat of the same winner-take-all scenario that played out in 1GbE interconnect. Vendors of standalone 10GbE PHY silicon ( AMCC (). VTSS (). Netlogic/Aeluros () ) should act close note. Broadcom’s role in hollowing out equipment is something we previously profiled in depth (see ). What is interesting about explore’s approach is that it has eschewed traditional 10GBASE optical standards and instead adopted off-standard solutions that better conform to its needs for time-to-market power and port density and be. While Google makes use of the SFP+ confine change it does not use the acquire dispersion compensation (EDC) answer typically associated with SFP+. Instead explore is looking to employ a combination of twinax cabling for short reach (<10m) intra-rack cabling and a motley 850nm SR-like standard. Off the shelf SR optical modules be to work come up up to 100m over without receive equalization. Ironically. Finisar () proposed such a solution several years ago. This non-standard and very low cost optical change should prove just as attractive to other datacenter customers. Given the delays in deploying production grade EDC solutions it is possible vendors ordain act forward with an SFP+ SR standard without EDC. This would be a boon to suppliers of SR based SFP+ modules such as Finisar and Avago as adoption of the SFP+ standard ordain accelerate faster once decoupled from the complexity and cost of EDC. (see ) It is difficult to cause the precise amount of components Google is purchasing. explore is believed to have in excess of 500,000 servers. Based on shipments of 10G SFP+ modules our beat guess puts Google’s current usage at approximately 5k ports of 10GbE a month. This would consider both server based SFP interconnect as come up as the switches themselves. While the be is low it is Google’s implementation and motivation for building their own switches that ordain resonate through the equipment and component industries. At this time other purveyors of large data centers like Yahoo. Microsoft and Equinix do not be to be following the same aggressive path with SFP+ optics. This is likely to change as new low be per port 10GbE equipment from Arastra. Woven. Force10. Cisco () and Juniper () go into production that make use of the new format. To us it is that is the most interesting affiliate in the context of Google’s decision. Arastra is building a system that closely matches what Google appears to be doing in secret. A picture of Arastra’s 7148S system with 48x 10GbE ports is below. Arastra presents the pseudo-IEEE standard 10GBASE-CR which appears to be the twinax approach Google is taking. Furthermore. Arastra was founded and funded by. Chief Architect at Sun Microsystems and who is closely tied to the CEO of explore and an ex-Sun executive. Andy Bechtolsheim was also one of the first investors in Google. With these connections. Arastra may be the commercialization of Google’s technology and the ultimate supplier to Google itself. Through our investigative investigate. Nyquist Capital reached the conclusion that 12 months ago explore took a look at the express of the art in 10GE switching equipment and decided that it could do better. The reasons behind this decision ordain undergo a large impact on how the small but rapidly growing 10GbE equipment and component merchandise evolves. Great dig but unfortunately. Google’s ’search’ missed a good one: Myricom. (www myricom com). Samueli’s and Bechtolsheim’s best and brightest could not make it pass the parking lot of throw Seitz’ little gem of a affiliate. These guys undergo been interconnecting some of the world’s most powerful clusters without ever breaking a egest. For more info on their change by reversal and the underlying technology see the links shout (say: going through their website requires patience and a gps unit). Andrew,Neat stuff. But this effort seems more of a testament to the “we’re smarter than everyone else” attitude at Google than a new business model. With production lead times for components plus system integration engineering and testing times it’s a rare commercial vendor who can do “custom” on demand for a variety of customers while still holding costs low or delivery times short. Google has a nice advantage of creating and supporting its own internal technology market. I haven’t seen any Google servers for sale at Costco so the larger impact seems constrained. But I do agree this effort exposes a potential market gap at the low end for a high density short reach low cater 10GbE switch. They answer 300 million examine queries a day about 3500 a second. Lets assume vast overkill of 1 server per query/back up that would put their search requirement at about 3500 consumer facing servers and lets assume another 50% for the crawl engine to furnish us a evaluate for search at say 5000 servers. Say the same for their other services. Youtube etc. listen serving is their biggest thing. I construe they answer 3 billion plus ads but the algorithms are simpler than examine and they don’t really answer ad’s they serve ad *blocks* (of 2. 3,4,6… ads) . I’m guessing another 5k for that. A double check say there are 1 billion Internet users that would furnish 1 server per 50k users or just short of 2 seconds of exclusive server measure a day i e about 20.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/16/googles-secret-10gbe-switch/#comment-32090

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Comment on Google?s Secret 10GbE Switch by Andrew@Nyquist muses on ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 13:22:23

It is our opinion that explore () has designed and deployed home-grown 10GbE switches as move of a secret internal initiative that was launched when it realized commercial options couldn’t meet the cost and power consumption targets required for their data centers. This decision by explore while small in terms of units purchased is enormous in terms of the disruptive impact it should undergo on 10GbE switching equipment providers and their component supply chains. It is as if a just arrived in the Enterprise networking business and the orbits of the existing satellites have begun to shift without observers knowing why - until now. We were watching shipments of SFP+ components for 10GbE in the merchandise but simply couldn’t account for their end destination - choose of an optical component dark be problem. After a great deal of investigation we undergo reached the following opinion: Through conversations with multiple carrier equipment and component industry sources we have confirmed that Google has designed built and deployed homebrewed 10GbE switches for providing server interconnect within their data centers. This is very similar to Google’s efforts to build its own server computers (excellent article ). explore realized that because its computing needs were very specific it could design and build computers that were cheaper and lower power than off the shelf alternatives. The decision to do so had a profound impact on server architecture and influenced the market’s move to displace cater density solutions that Sun () . Intel () and AMD () now embrace. It now appears that the affect Google trail blazed in the server computing market will repeat itself in the enterprise switching merchandise. Given the relative dearth of low-cost 10GbE switching solutions it isn’t surprising to see Google return this approach. We believe Google based their current change by reversal design on Broadcom’s () 20-port 10GE switch silicon () and SFP+ based interconnect. It is likely that Broadcom’s 10GbE PHY is also being employed. This would be a repeat of the same winner-take-all scenario that played out in 1GbE connect. Vendors of standalone 10GbE PHY silicon ( AMCC (). VTSS (). Netlogic/Aeluros () ) should act close say. Broadcom’s role in hollowing out equipment is something we previously profiled in depth (see ). What is interesting about Google’s come is that it has eschewed traditional 10GBASE optical standards and instead adopted off-standard solutions that better suit its needs for time-to-market power and port density and be. While explore makes use of the SFP+ cage change it does not use the receive dispersion compensation (EDC) function typically associated with SFP+. Instead explore is looking to employ a combination of twinax cabling for bunco reach (<10m) intra-rack cabling and a diversify 850nm SR-like standard. Off the shelf SR optical modules be to work come up up to 100m over without acquire equalization. Ironically. Finisar () proposed such a solution several years ago. This non-standard and very low cost optical format should prove just as attractive to other datacenter customers. Given the delays in deploying production grade EDC solutions it is possible vendors ordain move forward with an SFP+ SR standard without EDC. This would be a boon to suppliers of SR based SFP+ modules such as Finisar and Avago as adoption of the SFP+ standard ordain accelerate faster once decoupled from the complexity and be of EDC. (see ) It is difficult to determine the precise amount of components Google is purchasing. explore is believed to have in excess of 500,000 servers. Based on shipments of 10G SFP+ modules our beat anticipate puts Google’s current usage at approximately 5k ports of 10GbE a month. This would consider both server based SFP interconnect as well as the switches themselves. While the be is low it is Google’s implementation and motivation for building their own switches that will go through the equipment and component industries. At this measure other purveyors of large data centers like Yahoo. Microsoft and Equinix do not appear to be following the same aggressive path with SFP+ optics. This is likely to change as new low cost per port 10GbE equipment from Arastra. Woven. Force10. Cisco () and Juniper () come into production that alter use of the new change. To us it is that is the most interesting company in the context of explore’s decision. Arastra is building a system that closely matches what explore appears to be doing in secret. A picture of Arastra’s 7148S system with 48x 10GbE ports is below. Arastra presents the pseudo-IEEE standard 10GBASE-CR which appears to be the twinax approach Google is taking. Furthermore. Arastra was founded and funded by. Chief Architect at Sun Microsystems and who is closely tied to the CEO of Google and an ex-Sun executive. Andy Bechtolsheim was also one of the first investors in explore. With these connections. Arastra may be the commercialization of Google’s technology and the ultimate supplier to explore itself. Through our investigative research. Nyquist Capital reached the conclusion that 12 months ago Google took a look at the state of the art in 10GE switching equipment and decided that it could do better. The reasons behind this decision will have a large impact on how the small but rapidly growing 10GbE equipment and component market evolves. Great dig but unfortunately. explore’s ’examine’ missed a good one: Myricom. (www myricom com). Samueli’s and Bechtolsheim’s best and brightest could not alter it go the parking lot of Chuck Seitz’ little gem of a company. These guys undergo been interconnecting some of the world’s most powerful clusters without ever breaking a sweat. For more info on their switch and the underlying technology see the links shout (say: going through their website requires patience and a gps unit). Andrew,Neat cram. But this effort seems more of a testament to the “we’re smarter than everyone else” attitude at Google than a new business copy. With production bring about times for components plus system integration engineering and testing times it’s a rare commercial vendor who can do “custom” on bespeak for a variety of customers while still holding costs low or delivery times short. Google has a nice favor of creating and supporting its own internal technology market. I haven’t seen any explore servers for sale at Costco so the larger impact seems constrained. But I do agree this effort exposes a potential market gap at the low end for a high density short reach low power 10GbE change by reversal. They answer 300 million search queries a day about 3500 a second. Lets assume vast overkill of 1 server per ask/back up that would put their examine requirement at about 3500 consumer facing servers and lets assume another 50% for the crawl engine to give us a figure for examine at say 5000 servers. Say the same for their other services. Youtube etc. listen serving is their biggest thing. I construe they serve 3 billion plus ads but the algorithms are simpler than examine and they don’t really serve ad’s they serve ad *blocks* (of 2. 3,4,6… ads) . I’m guessing another 5k for that. A double analyse say there are 1 billion Internet users that would give 1 server per 50k users or just short of 2 seconds of exclusive server time a day i e about 20.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/16/googles-secret-10gbe-switch/#comment-32090

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Comment on Google?s Secret 10GbE Switch by Andrew@Nyquist muses on ..." posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 13:22:22

It is our opinion that Google () has designed and deployed home-grown 10GbE switches as part of a secret internal initiative that was launched when it realized commercial options couldn’t cater the cost and cater consumption targets required for their data centers. This decision by Google while small in terms of units purchased is enormous in terms of the disruptive impact it should have on 10GbE switching equipment providers and their component give chains. It is as if a just arrived in the Enterprise networking business and the orbits of the existing satellites undergo begun to alter without observers knowing why - until now. We were watching shipments of SFP+ components for 10GbE in the market but simply couldn’t be for their end destination - sort of an optical component dark matter problem. After a great broach of investigation we have reached the following opinion: Through conversations with multiple carrier equipment and component industry sources we have confirmed that Google has designed built and deployed homebrewed 10GbE switches for providing server connect within their data centers. This is very similar to Google’s efforts to build its own server computers (excellent article ). Google realized that because its computing needs were very specific it could create by mental act and build computers that were cheaper and lower power than off the shelf alternatives. The decision to do so had a profound force on server architecture and influenced the market’s act to lower power density solutions that Sun () . Intel () and AMD () now include. It now appears that the process Google dawdle blazed in the server computing market will repeat itself in the enterprise switching market. Given the relative dearth of low-cost 10GbE switching solutions it isn’t surprising to see Google return this approach. We believe Google based their current switch create by mental act on Broadcom’s () 20-port 10GE change by reversal silicon () and SFP+ based connect. It is likely that Broadcom’s 10GbE PHY is also being employed. This would be a repeat of the same winner-take-all scenario that played out in 1GbE interconnect. Vendors of standalone 10GbE PHY silicon ( AMCC (). VTSS (). Netlogic/Aeluros () ) should act close say. Broadcom’s role in hollowing out equipment is something we previously profiled in depth (see ). What is interesting about Google’s approach is that it has eschewed traditional 10GBASE optical standards and instead adopted off-standard solutions that better conform to its needs for time-to-market cater and port density and cost. While explore makes use of the SFP+ confine change it does not use the receive dispersion compensation (EDC) function typically associated with SFP+. Instead explore is looking to employ a combination of twinax cabling for short reach (<10m) intra-rack cabling and a motley 850nm SR-like standard. Off the shelf SR optical modules be to work well up to 100m over without receive equalization. Ironically. Finisar () proposed such a solution several years ago. This non-standard and very low cost optical change should prove just as attractive to other datacenter customers. Given the delays in deploying production evaluate EDC solutions it is possible vendors will move forward with an SFP+ SR standard without EDC. This would be a boon to suppliers of SR based SFP+ modules such as Finisar and Avago as adoption of the SFP+ standard will deepen faster once decoupled from the complexity and cost of EDC. (see ) It is difficult to cause the precise amount of components explore is purchasing. Google is believed to undergo in excess of 500,000 servers. Based on shipments of 10G SFP+ modules our best guess puts explore’s current usage at approximately 5k ports of 10GbE a month. This would consider both server based SFP connect as come up as the switches themselves. While the be is low it is explore’s implementation and motivation for building their own switches that will go through the equipment and component industries. At this time other purveyors of large data centers like Yahoo. Microsoft and Equinix do not be to be following the same aggressive path with SFP+ optics. This is likely to dress as new low cost per turn 10GbE equipment from Arastra. Woven. Force10. Cisco () and Juniper () come into production that alter use of the new format. To us it is that is the most interesting company in the context of explore’s decision. Arastra is building a system that closely matches what explore appears to be doing in secret. A picture of Arastra’s 7148S system with 48x 10GbE ports is below. Arastra presents the pseudo-IEEE standard 10GBASE-CR which appears to match the twinax approach explore is taking. Furthermore. Arastra was founded and funded by. Chief Architect at Sun Microsystems and who is closely tied to the CEO of Google and an ex-Sun executive. Andy Bechtolsheim was also one of the first investors in explore. With these connections. Arastra may be the commercialization of Google’s technology and the ultimate supplier to explore itself. Through our investigative research. Nyquist Capital reached the conclusion that 12 months ago Google took a look at the state of the art in 10GE switching equipment and decided that it could do better. The reasons behind this decision ordain undergo a large impact on how the small but rapidly growing 10GbE equipment and component market evolves. Great dig but unfortunately. Google’s ’search’ missed a good one: Myricom. (www myricom com). Samueli’s and Bechtolsheim’s best and brightest could not make it pass the parking lot of Chuck Seitz’ little gem of a affiliate. These guys have been interconnecting some of the world’s most powerful clusters without ever breaking a sweat. For more info on their change by reversal and the underlying technology see the links bellow (say: going through their website requires patience and a gps unit). Andrew,Neat cram. But this effort seems more of a testament to the “we’re smarter than everyone else” attitude at Google than a new business model. With production lead times for components plus system integration engineering and testing times it’s a rare commercial vendor who can do “custom” on bespeak for a variety of customers while comfort holding costs low or delivery times short. Google has a nice favor of creating and supporting its own internal technology merchandise. I haven’t seen any Google servers for sale at Costco so the larger force seems constrained. But I do agree this effort exposes a potential merchandise gap at the low end for a high density bunco arrive low cater 10GbE switch. They serve 300 million examine queries a day about 3500 a second. Lets assume vast overkill of 1 server per ask/back up that would put their examine requirement at about 3500 consumer facing servers and lets assume another 50% for the crawl engine to furnish us a figure for search at say 5000 servers. Say the same for their other services. Youtube etc. listen serving is their biggest thing. I read they serve 3 billion plus ads but the algorithms are simpler than examine and they don’t really answer ad’s they answer ad *blocks* (of 2. 3,4,6… ads) . I’m guessing another 5k for that. A double check say there are 1 billion Internet users that would give 1 server per 50k users or just short of 2 seconds of exclusive server measure a day i e about 20.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nyquistcapital.com/2007/11/16/googles-secret-10gbe-switch/#comment-32090

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the chips archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
27 articles in 2006-03
37 articles in 2006-04
27 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
7 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
10 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


chips